beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.30 2015가합575957

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The development of basic facts and cases shall delegate the management of the said construction to the Plaintiff.

- The plaintiff shall input all the materials, labor, equipment, etc. required for the construction after prior consultation with the development of the Category Industry, and the expenses shall be paid directly by the plaintiff within the following management amount:

- The development of the KC industry shall be paid to the Plaintiff the amount obtained by subtracting the input amount from the management amount below, and the Plaintiff’s account shall be borne for input exceeding the management amount.

- The management period from August 16, 201 to January 16, 2012: The management amount of KRW 1,442,00,000 (additional tax) and payment of KRW 1,442,00,000 (Additional tax): The payment terms for the development of the KC industry shall be governed by the payment terms.

On August 16, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a construction contract with the KC Industry Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “KC Industry Development”), with respect to civil and household facilities construction works among the four sections of the construction works for the development of the KC Industry and the development of the KC Industry under a contract for the development of the KC Industry, as follows (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

B. From September 8, 201, the Plaintiff received the construction cost of KRW 50,00,000 from the development of the KM industry in cash, following the completion of the said construction work. From November 2, 2011 to February 10, 2012, the Plaintiff received the construction cost as stated in the attached Form as a bill, depending on the completion of the said construction work.

C. Meanwhile, the case industry development is a stock company subject to external audit as prescribed in Article 2 of the Act on External Audit of Stock Companies. The defendant is an external auditor as prescribed in Article 3 (1) 1 of the above Act, and the 12 period (from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 of the business year to December 31, 2006) and 13 (from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 of the business year to December 31, 2007) of the 14 business year (from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008), 15 business years (from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009), and 16 business years from January 1, 2016 of the business year.