공장설립(변경)승인신청 반려 처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. B on December 21, 2005, on December 21, 2005, the first factory establishment approval, etc. in the factory site in the instant case is 1,580 square meters away from the Defendant on the land of this case (hereinafter “instant factory site”).
(2) On December 21, 2005, the approval of factory construction (type of business: other electronic components manufacturing business) was received from the Defendant, and obtained respectively from the Defendant on December 21, 2005, D in the E-land in the e-land in the e-mail, F in the G land, H in the I land, H in the I land, and J in the K land (hereinafter “the other factory site of this case”).
3) According to the land use plan and damage prevention plan map for each of the above subparagraphs 1 and 2, each of the above sections of the factory site and each of the above Section 2 (hereinafter “instant factory site”) were used as a road with a width of 6 meters wide leading to the contribution. The above approval plan was added to the approval condition that “the roads installed and drain pipes shall be used for official use after the completion and shall not be restricted to others.”
4) B and two others (hereinafter “B, etc.”)
(2) On September 5, 2006, the Plaintiff obtained on September 5, 2006, permission to occupy and use a road (local highway) with a total of 324 square meters of 324 square meters of 144 square meters of 30 square meters of 149 square meters of L, Do, M, 378 square meters of 378 square meters of L, Do, M, Do, and 244 square meters of 324 square meters of 324 square meters of 324 square meters of land (the permitted period: from September 5, 2006 to December 31, 2009), such as the purchase of the Plaintiff’s factory site and approval for the alteration of factory construction, etc. (1) on October 20, 206, the Plaintiff divided the instant factory site from B to 386,400,000 square meters of land, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the above factory site on December 14, 2006.
2) On December 8, 2006, the Plaintiff obtained approval of the modification of factory construction approval from the Defendant (Evidence 2) as follows, and at the time of approval (Evidence 2).