A. A. (1) On July 2, 2013, the Plaintiff leased a lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant (i) to the Defendant by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 90 million until May 14, 2014, the lease deposit amount of KRW 350 million, KRW 50 million per month of the rent for an apartment, and KRW 500,000 per month of the rent for an officetel (hereinafter “first lease agreement”).

(2) At the time of the first lease contract, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to bear the management expenses and the charges for causing traffic congestion of leased objects.

However, the Defendant’s financial standing is not good, and the Plaintiff paid 37,040,880 won for causing traffic congestion imposed on part of the object of the first lease contract by the head of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the head of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on October 10, 2014 on behalf of the Defendant.

(3) The adequate rent of the instant real estate is KRW 1,218,00 per month from May 15, 2014 to the date of closing the argument in the instant case.

B. The Plaintiff and Ei-Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Ei-Development”), the Plaintiff leased to Ei-Development a lease agreement with the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Ei-Development”) at KRW 10,000,000,000,000 for the lease deposit, KRW 10,000,000 for the lease deposit, KRW 30,000,000 for the rent of the second underground floor, and KRW 10,000,000 for the rent of the third underground floor. The lease agreement between the Plaintiff and Ei-Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Ei-Development”), which is treated as KRW 5,00,000 for the lease term, KRW 14,00,000 for the second floor, KRW 30,000,00 for the lease term, KRW 47,000 for the second floor, and KRW 4,200,00 for the lease term, KRW 330,000.

On July 1, 2011, the Plaintiff, who was treated as E.I.D. 110, set the lease deposit of KRW 20 million, KRW 1.4 million per month, KRW 111, and KRW 3 million per month, respectively.