산업재해보상보험료부과처분무효확인등
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
3. Text 1 of the judgment of the first instance; and
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is to dismiss or delete the following among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and to add the judgment as to the matters asserted by the defendant Labor Welfare Corporation to the following Paragraph 2. In addition to the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to this court, the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justifiable in view of the facts presented by the plaintiff to the court of first instance, and it is identical to Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the evidence that the plaintiff did not have any error as alleged by the plaintiff, so it
Each "237,194,990 won" shall be deemed to be "237,194,987 won" in 6th and 19th parallel.
The Enforcement Rule of the former Insurance Premium Collection Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Employment and Labor No. 207, Dec. 28, 2017) is amended by the Enforcement Rule of the former Insurance Premium Collection Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Employment and Labor, No. 207, Dec. 28, 2017).
The sum of 11 pages 19 shall be the sum "165,618,145 won".
16 pages 6, 7(Domark is excluded from the number of pages) "Industrial Reinsurance Premium Rates publicly notified pursuant to the Enforcement Decree of the Employment Reinsurance Collection Act" shall be "Industrial Reinsurance Premium Rates publicly notified pursuant to the Enforcement Decree of the Employment Reinsurance Premium Collection Act".
17 pages 21 of the 17th 21st " is difficult (the plaintiff asserts that the beer coolant constitutes a consumer product pursuant to Article 2 subparagraph 1 of the Framework Act on Consumers and Article 2 subparagraph 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on Consumers, but it is difficult to see that the business place selling beer, who sells beer, uses it for production to sell beer, which is a consumer, and thus falls under the consumer product as alleged)."
24. The 24th end of the 24th page “the history literature of judicial precedents” shall be deleted.
2. Additional determination by the Defendant Labor Welfare Corporation shall return unjust enrichment equivalent to the industrial accident insurance premium against the Plaintiff’s Defendant Labor Welfare Corporation.