Examining the evidence of the first instance court’s adoption, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found the Defendant guilty of the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act (excluding the acquittal portion) among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds indicated in its

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there are no errors of misapprehending the rules of logic and experience to recognize facts.

Meanwhile, although the Defendant submitted a written appeal to the effect that he is dissatisfied with the entire judgment of the court below, the remaining guilty portion is not specified in the final appeal and the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.