beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017. 08. 17. 선고 2017누47450 판결

선행판결의 기판력[국승]

Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court-2016 - Gu Group - 61122 (2017.04.07)

Title

Res judicata of a preceding judgment

Summary

The res judicata effect of a final and conclusive judgment dismissed in a lawsuit seeking revocation of a taxation disposition extends to the lawsuit seeking nullification of the said taxation disposition (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Du3669, May 16, 2003).

Related statutes

Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

Cases

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-47450

Plaintiff and appellant

AA

Defendant, Appellant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

National Rotations

Conclusion of Pleadings

July 13, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

August 17, 2017

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The transfer income tax reverted to the Plaintiff in January 1, 2013 by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on January 1, 2013

22,593,863 won shall be confirmed as null and void.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, civil law, since the reasoning of this court's judgment is identical to that of the first instance court.

It shall be quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Litigation Act.

2. Conclusion

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.