When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 6, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating, “The Defendant is proceeding with the wedding business from among the sloping doors, and is scheduled to carry out the wedding business with 51% equity interest.” On June 2014, the Defendant was scheduled to complete the wedding hall, and the Defendant would delegate the right to take photographs in the wedding hall and to take photographs to the victim C, if he/she is the down payment.”

However, the defendant was a person who has no authority at all over the wedding business of spawn Jin-Jin, and there was no interest in the wedding business of spawn-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant D under the name of the Defendant’s right to operate the wabs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C, E, and F;

1. An interrogation protocol of the police against the accused (including the second time and the replacement part);

1. Each police statement of E and C;

1. A criminal investigation report (to be accompanied by the details of D accounts in which the amount of damage is deposited), one detailed statement of transactions / investigation report (to be accompanied by a recording file in which a criminal suspect C and A dialogueed by the criminal suspect), one recording document;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel denied the facts charged in the instant case by asserting that, at the time when the Defendant received KRW 10 million from the victim, the shares in the wedding business, and that the Defendant had the intent or ability to delegate the right to take photographs and to delegate the right to take photographs to the Defendant, attached to the complaint and the mobile phone messages sent by the complainant and the Defendant.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the Defendant expressed to F the intent to invest in the wedding business, among the safewds, and contacted F with F.