사해행위취소
1. Dismissal of the claim for cancellation of the mortgage contract among the lawsuit of this case
2. The defendant B and the non-party D are as follows.
1. On July 3, 2014, the Plaintiff dismissed the part of the Plaintiff: (a) asserting that a donation contract concluded on July 3, 2014 with respect to real estate listed in the separate sheet between Defendant B and Nonparty D was a fraudulent act; (b) sought revocation of a mortgage contract concluded on July 3, 2014 by Defendant B and the subsequent purchaser on real estate listed in the separate sheet by Defendant C, a beneficiary; (c) however, a fraudulent act subject to the right to revoke a fraudulent act is a juristic act committed by the debtor; and (d) sought restitution to the subsequent purchaser together with the revocation of a fraudulent act between the debtor and the beneficiary; (c) therefore,
Therefore, the part of the claim for cancellation of the contract to establish a neighboring political party among the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and thus dismissed.
2. A cited part;
A. The remainder of the claim, excluding the part of the claim cancellation of the contract to establish a mortgage, as the reasons for the indication of the claim
(b) Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts.