When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On October 2, 2013, the injured Defendant: (a) around 22:00, at the Defendant’s house located in Daejeon Dong-dong C Apartment 313 1002, and (b) on the ground that the victim D (n, 37 years of age) and his/her children were the victim while disputing the problem of raising children, and (c) was faced with the wall on the ground that he/she became the victim, and (d) was collected toward the victim, and (e) was on the part of the victim’s growth, etc., in line with the victim’s growth part, etc., leading the victim to an inception for about two weeks.

2. From December 26, 2013, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 13:00 on December 26, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the entry of customers entering the beauty room by avoiding disturbance, such as singing the victim’s sound on the ground that the victim did not show his/her children properly; and (b) around December 27, 2013, around 12:00 and December 30, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s beauty room business by force by avoiding disturbance by means of the said method at the said place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D (including photographs);

1. In the crime of interference with business in determining the interference with business as to the obstruction of business of the copy of the medical certificate of injury, the intent of interference with business does not necessarily require the intention of interference with business or planned interference with business, and it is sufficient to recognize or anticipate the possibility or risk of causing interference with business of another person due to his own act, and its recognition or prediction is not definite but not only conclusive but also it is so-called willful negligence (see Supreme Court Decision 2008Do9410, Jan. 15, 2009). The threat of interference with business is neither tangible nor intangible nor intangible, since it does not ask a person's free will as any force that may cause interference with business, and thus, it includes violence, intimidation, social, economic, political status, and pressure based on rights. In reality, it includes the victim's pressure.