When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 200,000 won.

The defendant is the national of the People's Republic of China, and is the captain of the Chinese-China Ship C (Ap. 50 tons, steel).

A foreigner who intends to conduct fishery activities in an exclusive economic zone of the Republic of Korea shall obtain permission from the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.

Nevertheless, without obtaining the above permission, the defendant from March 30, 2015 to the same year.

4. From 08:52, by using promising fishing gear, approximately 21 nautical miles in the south, west, west, south, west, west, west, west, west, west, west, west, east, 124-47.7, and approximately 37.4 nautical miles in EZ) of the east, west, west, west, west, west, west, west, west, and 7.4 nautical miles

Accordingly, the defendant did not obtain permission and carried out fishery activities in the exclusive economic zone of the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Second prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. The details and location map of the detection, and each evidence photograph;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1.-Verification of position for operations, - Confirmation of catch, - copy of an application for fishing vessel operations, - copy of the certificate of ship's nationality (FAX), copy of the certificate of ship's nationality (FAX), copy of the certificate of ship's nationality, - copy of the certificate of ship's nationality, - details of entry into and exit of Chinese fishing vessels in Korea EEZ,

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 17 and Article 5 (1) of the Act on the Exercise of Sovereign Rights on Foreigners' Fishing, etc. within the relevant legal system on criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 21 of the Act on the Exercise of Sovereign Rights on Foreigners' Fishing, etc. in Confiscation Exclusive Economic Zone, Article 132 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 69(1) of the Criminal Act of the custody order is that the defendant, who completed the license for another vessel, keep the vessel as if it were the permit for the vessel of this case, and that it is difficult to obtain the fishery activity in the exclusive economic zone of Korea.