2. The case is one of the crimes under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and Articles 44 subparag. 1 and 9 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits, which are not prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act and the proviso of Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits.

However, according to the letter of withdrawal of the petition received by this court on May 3, 2013, workers B, C, and D can be acknowledged as the fact that they withdrawn the wishing to punish the Defendant on May 3, 2013, which was after the instant indictment was instituted.

3. Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.