1. At around 20:25 on February 9, 2014, at “Dju” located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si: (a) voluntarily reported to 112 on the ground that the employee did not sell alcoholic beverages; and (b) on the ground that the circumstances, such as publicly sound, etc., during the period of “I amb, I amb, I amb, I amb, I amb, I amb, I amb, I amb, I amb, I am.”

2. On the 10th of the same month, at around 01:00, the police box used the insult F, which was examined by the Namyang Police Station, to comply with the aforementioned insult, and used it as the police box, and used the franchis leader I at approximately 10 minutes of “drawing why he does not regulate the unauthorized businesses located in the amusement park in the approved mountain,” and used the coffee f, which was demanded by the police box to leave at the police box, against the assistant F to wear the sloping F’s working uniform.

2. Determination

A. As to the determination of assault, this part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim F expressed his/her intention not to punish the Defendant in this court after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, this part of the indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

B. As to the determination of insult, this part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and can be prosecuted upon a victim’s complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim F expressed his/her intent to cancel the complaint against the Defendant in this court on May 12, 2014, which is after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, this part of the indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article

more.