A. On November 26, 2012, Nonparty C operated by the Defendant Daegu Urban Gas Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) and on the Eindoor swimming pool working for Defendant AD, Nonparty C obtained straw straw straw straw straw straw straws in accordance with Defendant B’s instructions, and suffered injury from damage to the wind straw straws on the swimming pool, the head straw straws, and the straw straw straw straws on the swimming pool.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The instant accident did not explain the fact that, in relation to the acquisition of a swimming pool by Defendant B in danger compared to other swimming activities, the depth of the swimming pool, the angle of acquisition, and the subsequent acquisition of the swimming pool are highly likely to cause an accident unless accuracy is demonstrated, and the instant accident occurred due to negligence, without examining and correcting whether C’s self-sufficiency is correct at the time of its acquisition, and where C is in the water speed of the swimming pool at the time of its acquisition, the two descendants of C to obtain from the right side at the time of its acquisition, and the head portion of C obtained at the time of its acquisition, did not take measures to confirm that the head portion was from the bottom of the swimming pool, and the head portion of C obtained at the time of its acquisition does not go against the bottom of the swimming pool.

In addition, in the case of Defendant A, in consideration of the depth and level of the swimming pool of this case, and the physical strength and level of the swimming trainees, a person whose physical strength is more than a certain level as C is required not to obtain it through the swimming training on the slick attitude, but is negligent or negligent in failing to conduct such swimming training or allowing it.

C. From January 21, 2016, the damages lawsuit filed by C and their wife (hereinafter “C, etc.”) (Seoul District Court Decision 2013Gahap6401, Daegu High Court Decision 2014Na23141, the Defendants jointly and jointly as joint tortfeasor, and the Defendants were finally determined at that time to compensate C for the following medical expenses and the damages incurred therefrom. The date of closing the argument in the said lawsuit is the date of closing the argument. < Amended by Act No. 13201, May 21, 2015>