수상레저기구 일반조종면허시험 대행기관 지정 거부처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as admitting the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part of the judgment of the court of first instance) unless the relevant part of the judgment in the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows 2. Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance
2. The amendment portion of the 5th 8th 7th 7th 5th 7th 7th 5th 8th 9th 9th 9th 9th 9th 9th 9th
【The Plaintiff dismissed the appeal under the Supreme Court Decision 2019Du37677. However, on July 23, 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and the judgment of the second instance, which was the judgment of the first instance, became final and conclusive on July 23, 2019. Following the 6th day, the “Evidence 22 and 23” in the “Evidence 22 through 24.”
11 The “No. 13” of the 11st parallel shall be raised to “No. 13-2”.
Under 14, the "Support of Agricultural and Fishing Villages" shall be regarded as the "Support of Agricultural and Fishing Villages or the River Act".
The following shall be added between 15 and 9-10:
④ In the first and second previous rulings, the first and second rulings held to the effect that permission to occupy and use a river pursuant to the River Act should be obtained even if permission to use agricultural production infrastructure pursuant to the Rearrangement of Agricultural and Fishing Villages Act is obtained in order to install a floating mooring yard, etc. on the waters of this case, and all of the decisions as seen earlier became final and conclusive.
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is reasonable.
The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.