If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 14:47 December 18, 2019, the Defendant ordered coffee using the instant coffee shop, as it was impossible for the Defendant to enter the said coffee shop. However, the Defendant, while not on board a vehicle, was unable to use the “dyb ste”, and subsequently received the orders of the said shop, the Defendant used the Defendant’s “dyb ste” to the victim D (e.g., the employee of the said shop) about the late receipt of coffee as seen above, and used the victim to assault the Defendant, while she was able to use the instant coffee shop.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes after closure;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;