건축허가취소처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On February 10, 1964, the land category of the said land was changed to the land category on November 3, 1969, 1) I divided into 505 square meters in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul into 89, 2, 31 square meters in E paddy-gu, 385 square meters, and 2, the land was offered to the general public for a road connecting the public located on the south side of the land. Accordingly, the land was used as a road connecting the land and the Seoul Western-gu, Seoul Western-gu, 203 square meters in a road connected to the land to the public. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 18687, Nov. 3, 1969; Presidential Decree No. 18517, Apr. 7, 1977> < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 10748, Jan. 29, 200; Presidential Decree No. 18820, Feb. 21, 2012>
3) On April 7, 197, the said land was divided into: (2) 2-1 E 6 and 2-2 B 25 square meters; (2) 20 square meters for E 20 square meters and 20 square meters for E 20 square meters for E 20 square meters on October 20, 1978; and (2) 83 square meters for B 83 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).
(4) On June 5, 1973, the land category of the above land was changed to a site. On April 7, 1977, the F large 385 square meters was divided into three: three-1 F large 386 square meters and three-2 G large 249 square meters, and the conversion was made between three-1 F large 450 square meters and three-2 G large 823 square meters on October 197.
5) The defendant on January 7, 1988 (wholly amended by Act No. 4381 of May 31, 1991; hereinafter the same shall apply)
) 제4조 제2항, 제5조 제1항, 제27조 제1항에 따라 서울 서대문구 C 대 203㎡ 지상에 3층 건물을 신축하는 것을 허가하였는데, 당시 위 C 토지와 공로를 연결하는 도로인 이 사건 토지의 폭이 구 「건축법」 제2조 제15호가 정한 4미터에 미달한다는 이유로 신축 건물의 건축선을 위 C 토지의 안쪽으로 후퇴시키고 건축선에서 제외된 위 C 토지의 일부와 이 사건 토지를 합하여 위 C 토지와 공로를 연결하는 폭 4미터의 도로로 지정하였다. ◆ 구 「건축법」(1991. 5. 31. 법률 제4381호로 전부 개정되기 전의 것 ...