The Defendant had a complaint against the victim C (ma, 75 years of age) and his father, on the ground that the victim was able to take care of his house at the time of the withdrawal of alcohol, or was her mother, and was at the time of her mother. At present, there was a complaint against the victim on the ground that the victim was not suffering from dementia.

1. Bodily injury;

A. On April 2013, the Defendant: (a) taken the victim’s face from the victim C with dementia at the Defendant’s house located in Ansan-gu, Mayang-si; (b) taken the victim’s face from 3-4 times to 3-4 times with his/her hand floor, left the victim’s inner part of the treatment days.

B. From April 20 to April 21, 2013 to around 21, the Defendant: (a) in the place indicated in the preceding paragraph, she strokeed both ear of the victim by hand; and (b) 3 to 4 times with the victim’s face on his/her hand, she strokeed the victim with the victim’s face on his/her hand; and (c)

2. On April 24, 2013, at around 03:00 to 05:00, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim for the foregoing reasons while drinking alcohol with the victim at the places indicated in paragraph (a) on April 24, 2013; (b) taken a brupt against the victim’s chest, neck, hair, head, etc.; and (c) caused the victim to die due to chest damage (such as a crypus fry, scarke, scarke, and scarke), and scarf damage (brake, scarf, etc.).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning E and F;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. One copy of a report on the results of autopsy of a disaster, emergency medical services log, body autopsy report, body autopsy report, autopsy report of a person who has suffered from a disaster in Gyeyang Mayang-Ma-15494) and a copy of a written request for appraisal (2013-M-15494) for appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as field photographs, photographs, etc. (the appearance of a suspect who drinks on a new wall);

1. The point of injury resulting from the existence of each of Article 257(2) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, which is applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;