beta
(영문) 대법원 2019. 07. 11. 선고 2019두38205 판결

토지등 매매차익예정신고 가산세 부과 적정여부[국승]

Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2018Nu65264 ( March 27, 2019)

Title

Imposition of penalty tax;

Summary

The judgment of the court below is justified and dismissed, and it is reasonable to view that the duty to pay taxes at the time of preliminary return is determined provisionally, and that the additional tax and additional tax for arrears can be imposed on the plaintiff who failed to make a preliminary return under the former Framework Act on National Taxes even if it cannot be deemed that the duty to pay taxes at the

Related statutes

Article 47-4 of the Framework Act on National Taxes (Additional Tax for Indecent Payment and Refunding Return)

Cases

Supreme Court-2019-Du-38205 ( July 11, 2019)

Plaintiff-Appellant

00AA

Defendant-Appellee

Xhead of the tax office

The second instance decision

Seoul High Court-2018-Nu-65264 ( March 27, 2019)

Imposition of Judgment

201.7.11

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, since the appellant’s ground of appeal is clearly without merit as it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, an appeal is filed under

It is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.