2. The victim E’s investigative agency and the defendant in this court stated that “the victim” in the victim’s investigative agency and the victim in this court expressed that “the victim was imprisoned by being towed by being towed by selling the victim’s secret while taking a desire to be imprison,” and there was an injury diagnosis letter to the effect that the victim’s imprisoned by being towed.

However, the following facts or circumstances revealed by the record, namely, ① the Defendant and E were participating in the Fdong Meeting (GG school) conference at the time and time and place indicated in the facts charged in this case; ② E was started to punish H and speech meetings 20 years’ earlier, ③ the following me called “E was sent to the Defendant,” and ④ The I appears in this court that “the Defendant caused the chest when he wishes to cause E,” but did not put it out,” rather than the Defendant’s statement to the effect that “the Defendant does not have any her desire to take on the part of E,” ⑤ the I appears to have made a statement consistent with the Defendant’s vindication in the military branch as the motive of the E school, and the I appears to have no more credibility than the Defendant’s present E and the Defendant’s oral statement to the effect that it did not appear to have been presented.