온천발견신고 반려 및 원상회복(폐공) 명령처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff’s report process of hot spring discovery 1) The Plaintiff’s land in Busan Jin-gu (hereinafter “instant land”).
(1) The Defendant’s Intervenor B (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) is the owner and is only the Intervenor’s Intervenor B.
D) The land is D (hereinafter referred to as “neighboring land”)
(1) is the owner of the Company, and the MM (hereinafter referred to as “M”) is the owner of the Company.
(2) On August 13, 2013, the purpose of which is the development of groundwater and hot spring, etc. (hereinafter “the excavation report of this case”) was to report the excavation of groundwater in this case to the Defendant on August 13, 2013 pursuant to Article 9-4 of the Groundwater Act. The excavation on the report on the excavation of groundwater in this case (hereinafter “the report on excavation of groundwater in this case”) is as follows:
(4) On October 2013, the Plaintiff excavated the hot spring excavation report of this case into the same hot spring depth report (hereinafter “the hot spring excavation report of this case”) and the same hot spring depth report of this case (hereinafter “the hot spring excavation report of this case”) under Article 12(5) of the Hot Spring Act (amended by Act No. 11896, Jul. 16, 2013) and Article 7(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, with its location changed to paragraph (4) and its location changed to paragraph (5) and Article 7(2) of the Enforcement Rule.