손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
The court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance court's judgment, except for adding the following additional decisions to the third or lower court's 6th or lower court's 6th or lower court's 3th or lower court's 6th or lower court's 6th or lower court's 6th or lower court'
In addition, even if the damage from electronic financial transactions suffered by Plaintiff B falls under the above Article of the means of access as provided by Article 9(1)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the aforementioned evidence: ① an electronic financial transaction accident such as singing or singing at the time the damage from electronic financial transactions occurred; ② at the time the Plaintiff B was using the Internet banking service at the time of 32 years of age or more; ③ continuously commenced sing/sing-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-up-out-out-out-out-out-out-
Therefore, the act of disclosure of financial transaction information by Plaintiff B constitutes a case where there is a user’s “serious negligence” in the occurrence of financial accidents stipulated in Article 9(2) and (3) of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, Article 8 subparag. 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and Article 20 of the Framework Clause of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. In light of the very serious degree of gross negligence of Plaintiff B as above, pursuant to Article 9(2) subparag. 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.