beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.10.14 2020고단6790

협박

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was a police official belonging to the district unit having jurisdiction over the place of residence of the victim B (n, 39 years of age), and that was in a relationship with the victim from July 2019.

On December 6, 2019, the Defendant knew that the victim had sexual intercourse with the victim at the residence of the victim located in Incheon-gun, Incheon-gun, and then withdrawn KRW 2.7.80,000,00 from the Defendant’s account. B) as if he had taken the victim’s sexual intercourse with the video on the same day at the closed site of Incheon-gun (hereinafter referred to as Incheon-gun) and had the victim’s sexual intercourse with the video, the Defendant sent the victim’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant as Kakaox, “In the instant case, the Defendant sent the victim’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant at the school of Kakao-Ma, Kakao-si, and only several Mao-si, but the Defendant sent the victim’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant.” The Defendant and the Defendant sent the victim’s sexual intercourse with the victim’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant, as if the victim had sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant, and the Defendant and the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant and the Defendant’s sexual wave.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim pursuant to Article 283(3) of the same Act.

According to the records of this case, it is recognized that the victim expressed his intention not to punish the defendant around September 28, 2020, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.