However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 24, 2014, the Defendant driving a Dok-gu Dak-gu 10-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si 41-dong 7.3km-ri-si-ri-ri-ri-si-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si

2. On November 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on November 25, 2014, at the underground parking lot as indicated in paragraph (1) around 00:33, the Defendant: (b) while sitting in the driver’s seat of the said car and divinged; (c) upon receiving a report on a drunk driving, demanded a slope F to leave the vehicle to the Defendant; (d) on his/her hand, he/she saw F’s hand to be called “F’s hand; (d) he/she gets off his/her hand; and (e) Hah of the police station G zone located within the branch of the branch police station, who was called to be called to “Isk to go to go to the seat”; and (e) caused his/her shock to fall off, she was sprinking the flow of the H’s bridge by hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of F and H's report on drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H and F;

1. Detailed reports on the circumstances of a drinking driver and notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Investigation report (as to the statement of the first report on drunk driving);

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph, video CD, or CCTV image CD;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant is driving under the influence of alcohol, and the police officers dispatched after receiving a report of drunk driving.