Around 05:05 on May 24, 2013, the Defendant came to know through D, G, and D on the street in front of the Franc City E, the Defendant 3, while drinking alcohol, and then drinking alcohol to G, and the Defendant her body fights against D, etc. under the influence of alcohol, and her body body was pushed off with D, and the victim her chest was tightly pushed back to the vicinity of the instant detailed body, and caused the victim to have his her hair cut back to the front line of the prohibition of parking. The Defendant 2, when the victim her hair died in the future with D, her hair and her head h (42 years of age) and her head h (hereinafter referred to as D, her head h (42 years of age) and her head h (hereinafter referred to as “D”) her head h (hereinafter referred to as “the victim h) h (3): When the victim h (1) h (3) h (4) h (1) h) h) k) her face of the victim’stro.

2. Determination

A. In order to pronounce a guilty of the Defendant, there must be evidence of probative value, which leads to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt, and if there is no such evidence, even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the Defendant, it should be determined with the benefit of the Defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Do767 delivered on April 15, 2005, etc.). B.

The results of each verification of CCTV CD by this court, the National Health Insurance Corporation, the National Health Insurance Corporation, the House of Government Fire-Fighting, 119 Safety Center.