However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who works as the on-site supervision of the victim D Co., Ltd. who ordered the above construction at the construction site of the relocation facility at the Gyeonggi Yang-si.

1. On June 30, 2013, the Defendant claimed labor cost to the victim at the above construction site and obtained 4,825,000 won in total as labor cost of the human body from the victim by deceiving the victim and receiving 2,795,000 won in the name of labor cost of the above E, as shown in the attached list of crimes (1) as follows: (a) from around that time to October 31, 2013; and (b) by deceiving the victim by the same method and deceiving the victim as labor cost of the human body, as stated in the attached list of crimes (1).

2. On June 30, 2013, the Defendant filed a claim for equipment replacement with the victim at the construction site above and around October 31, 2013. The facts are as follows: (a) deceiving the victim as if the actual cost of equipment was KRW 20,795,50 in F and G, which was 27,197,50, by deceiving the victim as if the actual cost of equipment was 27,197,500; and (b) deceiving the victim as a replacement for equipment; and (c) obtained the difference of KRW 6,402,00 from the victim to the victim five times from the time of the occurrence to October 31, 2013; and (d) by deceiving the victim as if the actual cost of equipment replacement was 65,939,500 won, the amount was 88,676,500 won in total and by deceiving the victim under the name of the victim; and (d) obtained the difference of KRW 86,707,707

3. On October 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) did not have any fact that the Defendant was responsible for the construction of the above construction site; and (b) did not have any fact with respect to the machinery and equipment of the master, the Defendant, claiming for the cost of outsourcing to the victim; (c) deceiving the victim as if he/she were responsible for the construction of the master, and deceiving the victim as if he/she were responsible for the cost of outsourcing from the victim, and then