If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

1. On March 24, 2019, at around 00:39, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties: (a) took the front of the Da-si, the victim C (the age of 60) was seated in the front of the Da-si, Sungnam-si; (b) taken the Da-si, which was operated by the victim C (the age of 60) and brought the Do-si, saying, “each year” on the ground that the victim re-enters the Defendant’s destination; and (c) taken the said Do-si on the ground that the victim re-enters the Defendant’s destination; and (d) took the Do-si, the Defendant hearded the victim’s phrase, “I am at the seat of the Do-si and

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's taxi driver's duty by force.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, upon receiving a report from the police officer dispatched at the time, time, and place as stated in paragraph (1), expressed that “scop and the body in the body of the police officer.” This two-way rings rings, inside the body of the police officer, “math on the body of the police officer,” lying off the door under the front gate of the patrol police officer, and drick on the two-lane road over four minutes, under the influence of alcohol in the direction of the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant, under the influence of alcohol, committed an act of lying on the road in a manner that interferes with traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 157 subparagraph 4 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 68 (3) 1 and 2 (the point of violation on the road) of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;