However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 18, 2014, around 19:30 on October 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 to the effect that “the proprietor in front of the C cafeteria in Daegu would depart from disturbance; (b) was urged by E to return home from the police station affiliated with the Daegu Haak Police Station D police box called out; (c) sent two times to the right shoulder part of E to drinking; and (d) threatened the police officer’s face part of the 112 reported case, thereby hindering the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 11 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of deaf-mutes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;