동산인도 청구의 소
1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the movable property listed in the attached list.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
3...
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff terminated each lease contract with the defendant on December 5, 2014 on the movables listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and on May 18, 2016 on the movables listed in the separate sheet No. 2, and on the ground that the defendant did not pay the lease fee while taking over and using the movables listed in the separate sheet No. 1 and No. 2, the plaintiff did not pay the lease fee.
According to the above facts, each lease contract is deemed to have been lawfully terminated due to the defendant's default, and the defendant is obligated to deliver movable property specified in the attached Tables 1 and 2 to the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified.