식품위생법위반
2016Do20666 Violation of the Food Sanitation Act
A person shall be appointed.
A person shall be appointed.
A person shall be appointed.
A person shall be appointed.
A person shall be appointed.
6. The FF Stock Company;
Prosecutor
Law Firm G (for all the Defendants)
Attorney BM, I, H
Law Firm J (LLC) (For all the Defendants, LLC)
Attorney K, L, BJ
Seoul Western District Court Decision 2015No1999 Decided November 28, 2016
October 12, 2017
All appeals are dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court: (a) as to the facts charged in this case against the Defendants
The judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the defendant on the ground that there is no proof of two crimes.
Examining the record, the above determination by the court below is justifiable. Contrary to logical and empirical rules
In violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, it erred by exceeding the bounds of the Food Sanitation Act.
(2).
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
this decision is delivered.
Justices Cho Jae-chul et al.
Justices Go Young-young
Justices Jo Hee-de
Justices Kim Jong-il