가.도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)·나.도로교통법위반(음주운전)·다.자동차손해배상보장법위반
2017Do20628 A. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures Not Taken after Accidents)
(b) Violation of the Road Traffic Act;
(c) Violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;
A
Prosecutor
Law Firm B
Attorney C, D, E, F
Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2017837 Decided November 16, 2017
March 15, 2018
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court: (a) the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) among the facts charged in the instant case
The judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the defendant on the ground that there is no proof of crime.
Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable.
As alleged in the grounds of appeal, it exceeds the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.
No error may be found.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
shall be determined.
Justices Ko Young-han
Justices Kim Gin-young
Justices Kwon Soon-il
Justices Cho Jae-chul