However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:15 on March 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) discovered the Defendant, who was under the influence of alcohol on a parking lot, and was called up on the front side of “C” in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, and received a report on 112-day, stating that “Nun is under the influence of alcohol on the parking lot; and (b) deemed necessary to take protective measures, and transferred the Defendant to the hospital by patroling the Defendant at the vehicle; (c) without any justifiable reason, the Defendant took a bath to “I am out, I am out, I am dead, I am dead, I am, and I am am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the dispatch of 112 report and the protection of the people.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommendation] The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code / [the scope of the sentence of the obstruction of performance of official duties] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) (the special person) [the decision of the sentence] [the defendant needs to be strictly punished in that police officers interfere with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties by abusing violence. However, the defendant's mistake is recognized and against his mistake. However, the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime, and there is no other means and result of the crime in the instant case, taking into account the circumstances after the crime was committed, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, etc.