A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, and by a fine of five million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Defendant

A is a doctor who operates the "E-out hospital" in the Gu, American, and the defendant B is a person who works as the head of the office at the above hospital and is the defendant A's wife.

No person other than a medical person shall perform medical practice, and no medical person shall perform any medical practice other than that licensed.

Nevertheless, the Defendants: (a) performed the surgery at the above hospital; (b) performed the surgery at the hospital; (c) performed the surgery at the hospital; (d) performed the surgery by assisting the surgery at the direction of the Defendant A; and (e) performed the surgery at the operating room at the fourth floor of the above hospital in July 2014; (c) performed the surgery at the hospital in order to open the surgery at the direction of the Defendant A; (d) assisted the surgery by the Defendant A; and (e) explained the matters of care after the surgery to the patient on behalf of the nurse after the surgery.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with Defendant B to perform medical practice without obtaining a license for four patients, such as patient F, from July 2014 to March 2016, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, including that Defendant B performed medical practice without obtaining a license as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Each police statement made to F, H, I, J, and K;

1. Seizure records;

1. Investigation report (as to the execution of a warrant of search and seizure), investigation report (as to the phone call of the 16-year patient through a request for the provision of communication data), investigation report (as to the phone call of the 16-year patient through a request for the provision of communication data), investigation report (as to the phone call of the 15-year patient through a request for the provision of communication

G From the investigative agency to this court, “Defendant B subsidized Defendant A’s surgery and explained the patient’s attention.”

“A very specific and consistent statement,” and at the time of the operation by F, I, J, and K Investigative Agency, the patient of the above hospital, which is the patient of the hospital.