beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.23 2015가합542872

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Defendant M and N jointly do 3,00,000,000 won for Plaintiff D and G, respectively, and 3,000,000,000 won for Plaintiff E, F, H, and I, respectively, and the Plaintiff A, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant M&A’s harmful act 1) Plaintiff A, D, G, and J (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) are all young children working at the U-child care center located in Ansan-si T (hereinafter “instant child care center”). Plaintiff B, C, the Plaintiff’s parents, Plaintiff E, and F are Plaintiff D’s parents, Plaintiff H, and Plaintiff H, and L are the parents of Plaintiff J (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiff’s parents”), Plaintiff H, and Plaintiff K, and Defendant M are the parents of Plaintiff J. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiff’s parents”), and Defendant N&C’s husband’s husband.

3) On August 11, 2014, Defendant M: (a) around 11:35, at the class of the Child Care Center of this case, Defendant M committed a harmful act, such as taking children into consideration, from August 21, 2014, from around August 15:1, 2014 (hereinafter “instant harmful act”); (b) around August 21, 2014, at the parents of victimized children, reported the harmful act of this case to the Child Protection Agency (hereinafter “Special Child Protection Agency”) on August 22, 2014; and (c) on August 21, 2014, by the parents of victimized children, reported the harmful act of this case to the Child Protection Agency of Ansan-si (hereinafter “Special Child Protection Agency”) on August 22, 2014.

2) After completing an investigation into the instant harmful act, on September 4, 2014, a specialized child protection agency: (a) determined the instant harmful act as the body and emotional abuse of the victimized children; and (b) drafted a summary of the case report; (c) An investigation agency’s disposition 1) an investigation agency entered Defendant M and N as a violation of the Child Welfare Act in relation to the instant harmful act; and (c) sent it to the Suwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office within the jurisdiction of the competent District Public Prosecutor’s Office on September 16, 2014.

2 The defendant P, as a main prosecutor, is conducting an additional investigation, such as the suspect investigation on the defendant M and N, while conducting an additional investigation.

참조조문