When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 ㈜캡스 보안요원으로 근무하던 중 2015. 12. 27. 16:00경 C으로부터 부산 동구 D에 있는 NH농협은행 E 지점 365일 자동화기기 코너 현금인출기에 설치된 인터폰으로 그곳에서 피해자 F이 통장 정리하며 놓아둔 통장과 상품권이 들어 있는 지갑을 습득하였다는 내용의 신고를 받았다.

On the same day, at around 16:15, the Defendant was dispatched to the NAF Bank E branch of the NHFF Bank E branch of the 365-day automatic withdrawal machines, and was in order to take over the acquired materials from C and keep them in the said Nonghyup Bank, the Defendant was stolen from the Kackin, by means of taking the amount of KRW 195,00,00 in total, KRW 50,00,00,00 for 1,50,00 for 5,00 for 10,000 for 1,50,000 for 1,50,000 for 1,00 won for 10,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Each statement made to F, C, and H;

1. CCTV images and duplichographs, CD screen pictures;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports (fields), investigation reports (to attach photographs of the closure details to output of the closure details), photographic outputs and outputs reported by the suspect;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The assertion and judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. 주장의 요지 피고인 및 변호인은, 피고인이 공소사실 기재와 같이 ㈜캡스(이하 ‘캡스’라 한다) 보안요원으로 근무하던 중 C이 습득한 피해자 F의 지갑을 건네받아 농협 고객대기실 의자에 그대로 놓아두었을 뿐, 지갑에서 상품권을 꺼내어 가 절취한 사실은 없다고 주장한다.

2. Determination:

A. According to the evidence adopted earlier, the following facts and circumstances are recognized.

1 A victim F shall be 195,000 won, as stated in the facts charged, while filing a passbook at the cash withdrawal machine at the agricultural E branch around 13:06 on December 27, 2015.