보상금등지급신청기각결정취소
1. The Defendant’s disposition rejecting compensation payment made against the Plaintiff on May 2, 2014 is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a person who raises Chinese friendship in the South-Namn Navy B.
B. On February 21, 2012, a public veterinarian affiliated with the South Navy visited the Plaintiff’s stable to contact the Plaintiff’s stable with the 7th head of the Korea Navy (hereinafter “the instant vaccination”).
In relation to the Livestock Industry-1717 ( May 26, 2011), in relation to the "Measures for prompt payment of compensation for slaughter of the foot-and-AI", there is no notification that the demand for the application for the delivery of the thickness will not be accepted, since June 1, 201, according to the full-time transition of the remedy station.
C. On April 30, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the payment of compensation under the Contagious Animal Disease Prevention Act, stating that “one of the Plaintiff-owned only (hereinafter “the Plaintiff-owned only”) died from shock caused by the instant vaccination on February 23, 2012,” but the Defendant rejected the claim against the Plaintiff for the payment of the said compensation on May 2, 2014 for the following reasons:
(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.
On the other hand, the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries has changed the names of the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, and the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
On May 26, 2011, the Minister notified the head of the relevant metropolitan organization, including the Do governor, of the plan for prompt payment of burial compensation, along with the official letter to the effect that the compensation for slaughter can be paid smoothly in order to support the re-issuance through early re-entry of the relief station and AI damaged farmers. On May 26, 201, the Gyeongnam Do governor notified the head of the local government in the Gyeongnam-do, including the defendant, of the "plan for prompt payment of burial compensation" on May 26, 2011 (the livestock industry-17) and the "plan for prompt payment of burial compensation" are subject to subparagraph 1 (a) of the Enforcement Decree of the Prevention of Contagious Animal Diseases Act [Attachment 1] of the Enforcement Decree of the Prevention of Contagious Animal Diseases Act.