beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.10.15 2019가단75887

손해배상(기)

Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Since 1997, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion has supplied the Defendant’s petition factory with a printing balance plate (which is used to print pictures and letters on the surface of the ospill box).

The Defendant unfairly lowered the subcontract price for a printed balance plate supplied by the Plaintiff from November 2015 to December 2016 by taking advantage of its superior position. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered damages from KRW 9,061,93 in total from around the above time to December 2016.

Article 4 (Prohibition of Determination of Unreasonable Subcontract Consideration) (1) Where a principal contractor entrusts a subcontractor with the manufacture, etc., he/she shall not compel a subcontractor to determine or accept subcontract consideration at a level lower than the price generally paid for the same or similar manufacture, etc. of subject matter, etc.

(2) Any act by a principal contractor falling under any of the following subparagraphs shall be deemed fixing unreasonable consideration for subcontract:

1. Fixing subcontract consideration by putting the unit price at a uniform rate without any justifiable reasons;

5. It constitutes an act that a principal contractor unilaterally determines the subcontract consideration at a low price, and thus, constitutes an act that violates the subcontract consideration, thus seeking compensation for such damages.

(원고는 소장에서 피고가 2014. 4.부터 2015. 1.까지 부당하게 대금을 감액 지급함에 따라 1,100,000원의 손해를 입었다면서 이에 대한 손해배상도 함께 구하였으나, 2020. 4. 1.자 준비서면에서 위 주장을 철회하였다). 2. 판단 원고가 피고에 납품하는 인쇄수지판의 단가가 2015. 10.경 5mm 수지판 28원/㎠, 7mm 수지판 30원/㎠, 조판비 9,000원이었는데, 2015. 11.경부터 5mm 수지판 25원/㎠, 7mm 수지판 27원/㎠, 조판비 8,000원으로 변경된 사실은 당사자 사이에 다툼이 없고, 갑 제2호증의 기재에 의하면, 피고의 모회사 C 주식회사(이하 ‘C’이라 한다)의 직원 D이 2015. 11...