However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[2019 Highest 2415] The Defendant was a person who actually runs a mobile phone sales store called "C" located in Seo-gu, Daejeon from around December 24, 2013 to November 1, 2018, and is a personal information manager. From around April 2017, the Defendant was supplied with a mobile phone owned by the victim "C" from the victim "Co., Ltd." to sell the mobile phone and decided to commission the mobile phone sales by paying the sales proceeds to the victim's company.

1. Forgery of private documents under the title of E, uttering of falsified Investigation Documents, and violation of the Personal Information Protection Act;

A. On February 19, 2016, the Defendant entered “E”, “G”, “E”, and “E” in the address column in the customer name column of the “F subscription application form” at C Sales Store, and forged one copy of the “F subscription application form” in the name of E, a private document pertaining to rights and obligations, for the purpose of arbitrarily signing and exercising signature in the signature column, and then sent the forged “F subscription application form” to the public official in charge of the affairs of I, a company, who is aware of the forged fact, and then sent it to the public official in charge of the affairs of the Defendant’s personal information custody and provided it to a third party without the consent of E without the consent of E.

B. On August 22, 2016, the Defendant entered “E”, “G”, and “E” in the customer name column of the “E” in the “application for alteration of IMoble service” at C sales store, and forged one copy of the “application for alteration of IMoble service” in the name of E, which is a private document related to rights and duties, for the purpose of arbitrarily signing and exercising signature in the column for signature column. As seen above, the Defendant can can can the “application for alteration of IMoble service,” which is forged, and the Defendant is genuine to the employees in charge of the I’s in charge of the BMoble service.