beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.10.13 2017고단850

전자금융거래법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

2017 No person shall transfer or take over any access medium. < Amended by Act No. 8500, Mar. 1, 2017>

Nevertheless, the Defendant transferred the access media by giving one head of Tong and one check card connected to the Korean-style Investment Securities Account (500-056323-11) in front of a lot in front of a lot in the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu., the Defendant transferred the access media by giving one head of Tong and one check card connected to the (50-056323-11).

2017 No person shall transfer any access medium. < Amended by Act No. 15740, Mar. 1, 2017>

피고인의 동생 E은 ‘ 유령 법인’ 명의의 계좌를 개설하여 이를 사설 스포츠 토토 운영자 등에게 판매하기로 마음먹고, 2015. 말경부터 2016. 초경 사이에 3~5 회에 걸쳐 피고인에게 주식회사 엡솔 네트 웍스 명의의 위임장, 사업자등록증, 인감 증명서 등을 건네주면서, ‘ 나도 누군가에게 부탁을 받은 것인데, 형님이 나 대신에 계좌를 개설하여 내게 달라’ 고 부탁하였다.

In response to the above E’s request, around February 15, 2016, the Defendant visited the branch office of Korea bank in the unification of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and misrepresented the employees of the said company, opened the said company’s account (1005-302-92058) with the power of attorney, etc. in the name of the said company, and opened the above company’s account (1005-302-92058) with the name of the said company, and sent the passbook, check card, andOTP connected to the said account to E.

After all, E promised to receive KRW 1.2 million per month from the user fee per account of passbook, e-mail card, etc. connected to the above account, and sold it to the operator of the private sports entertainment site.

As a result, the Defendant was able to facilitate the violation of the E Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

Summary of Evidence

2017 Highest 850

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The document of F;

1. Search and seizure inspection warrant reply (2016-4853) 2017 order 1574;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. To inquire into personal information of customers, to certificates of deposit transaction records, etc.;