beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.23 2017가단5050566

분양대금반환청구

Text

1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 31, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract for 505 (hereinafter “instant real estate sales contract”) out of the “D hotel” on the ground of Pyeongtaek-si (hereinafter “instant hotel”), 161,69,500 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), 16,169,950 (hereinafter “the instant contract”), 16,960, 169, 160, 169, 169, 160, 169, 169, 169, 169, 160, 169, 160, 169, 169, 160, 169, 160, 169, 160, 169, 169, 160, 169, 169, 169, 160, 196, 196, 196, 1606, 196, 16, 160.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

“A” means the Defendant;

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

(2) When this contract is terminated due to a cause falling under Article 3(3), “A” shall be paid 10% of the total supply price as penalty to “B”. Article 7(6) of the Act provides that “B” shall either repay the loan before the entry into the room or convert it into a secured loan.