가.변호사법위반·나.범죄수익은닉의규제및처벌등에관한법률위반
2017Do4309 A. Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act
(b) Violation of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment.
A person shall be appointed.
Defendant
Law Firm AD
Attorney AF, AE, AI, AJ, AK
Seoul High Court Decision 2016No2740 Decided March 15, 2017
June 15, 2017
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
In light of the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the permissible scope of Amendments to Bill of Indictment, the establishment of joint principal offenders, and the arrangement of the offense of violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding facts contrary to logical and empirical rules, or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Lee Ki-taik
Justices Kim Yong-deok
Chief Justice Kim Shin-chul
Justices Kim Gin-young