Text

1. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim added at the trial and the plaintiff's appeal are all dismissed.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the judgment of the party member of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) up to No. 15 No. 2 of the decision of the court of first instance from No. 3 to No. 5; (b) as a result of the appraiser No. 15; (c) as a result of the appraiser No. D’s appraisal of the first instance court appraiser No. 1; (d) as a whole, the appraiser No. 1 presented that “the name of the defendant affixed on the loan transaction agreement of this case (Evidence No. 1-1) shall be presumed to be a stamp image different from the Defendant’s seal affixed on the Defendant’s seal imprint No. 1-1; (e) the name and address of the Defendant’s name and address stated on the Defendant’s letter of commitment No. 2 (Evidence No. 1-1) prepared by the Defendant; and (e) the Plaintiff’s name and address stated on the Plaintiff’s letter of credit transaction (Evidence No. 8); and (e) the Plaintiff’s name and address stated on the Defendant’s name No. 1-2’s letter of credit transaction agreement of this case.