A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

except that this judgment.

Defendant

A is the actual operator as the representative of B, and the defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of supplying aggregate, performing civil works, landscaping works, etc.

1. No person who intends to reclaim or incinerate wastes in any place other than the waste disposal facilities permitted, approved, or reported pursuant to the Wastes Control Act;

Nevertheless, from February 2014 to December 2, 2015, the Defendant illegally buried in seven farmland, such as Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, without entrusting the disposal facilities permitted, approved, or reported in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, in disposing of inorganic sludge, which is industrial wastes generated from the said sand production facilities, such as in-house waste disposal facilities.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in the above Paragraph (1), the Defendant, a representative of the Defendant, illegally buried industrial wastes in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Each photograph, a copy of construction machinery registration certificate, a copy of business registration certificate and land cadastre;

1. Accusation against the person in violation of the Wastes Control Act, public notice on the grounds for the reclamation of wastes, and wastes;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 63 subparagraph 2 of the Wastes Control Act and Article 8 (2) (general control) of the Wastes Control Act; Articles 67, 63 subparagraph 2 of the Wastes Control Act and Article 8 (2) (general control) of the same Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B Co., Ltd.) lies in the fact that Defendant A had been sentenced to a fine multiple times for the same kind of crime, such as Clean Air Conservation Act, re-offending during the period of suspension of execution, the time of and reflects the crime.