However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On July 3, 2016, at around 23:09, the Defendant requested the police to be called up to the “C cafeteria” located in B, Chungcheongnam-si. Around that time, the Defendant was asked for questioning of the police officer E, etc., who was called up after receiving a report.

The defendant, at the same place 23:20 on the same day, is asked questions about the reason why he reported to the policeman E at the same place. "A bit of bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, and inside the country."

“Abruting,” and “Abruting,” from a policeman E, heard the horses, “Abruous bitched bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a son.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement to E: 1. 112 Report processing statement;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of the fact that the defendant is recognized and reflects the crime of this case, and that the defendant has no criminal records nor criminal records of the same kind, etc.);