However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 3, 2019, at around 14:08, the Defendant was subject to parking control against 2 vehicles for business in front of Seoul, the parking administration of the Seoul Cgu Office and affiliated illegal parking and stopping control D, and the Defendant told D, who said D, saying, “Chose, embling or drinking so that fats can stop all fats, and live.” The Defendant saw D’s fat, fatd D’s fat, and led D’s fat.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning parking regulation of illegal parking/stopman.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the first police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One to five years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] the obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1] There is no person [the scope of the recommended and recommended sentence] [the scope of the recommendation field and recommended sentence], the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the scope of the recommendation field and recommended sentence], the term of six months to one year and six months [the general person] [the grounds for suspension of execution] - The major reasons for suspension of execution - The major reasons for suspension of execution: The person not subject to punishment - the person not subject to punishment - the same kind of offense and the reason for general pride:

3. Determination of sentence: Six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence;