가.특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)나.사기다.유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반
A. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud)
(b) Fraud;
C. Violation of the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission
A
Defendant
Law Firm B
Attorney C, D, AJE, AJK, AJL
Seoul High Court Decision 2015Do1850 Decided January 29, 2016
8,2016. 29
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found the Defendant guilty of the modified facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the regulation of the act of fund-raising and fund-raising
Justices Lee Jae-soo
Justices Kim Yong-deok
The Chief Justice Kim Jae-young
Justices Lee Dong-won