근로기준법위반등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant, as the representative C in Gyeonggi-do, operates a computer network repair business using four full-time workers.
Defendant Company was working in the said workplace from September 25, 2013 to March 25, 2015 and did not pay KRW 850,00 of the monthly wage of February 2015 to retired workers D, and KRW 2,341,930 of the monthly wage of March 2015 and KRW 2,772,464 of the retirement allowance within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement on the extension of the payment deadline.
The reason why the public prosecution is dismissed is a crime of non-competence, and the withdrawal of the complaint was submitted to the court to the effect that the employee D does not want the punishment of the defendant.