A. 1) The facts of recognition C are as follows: (a) the D car under the state of 0.154% alcohol concentration in blood on August 30, 2018 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) G (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) that was parked on the front of Pyeongtaek-si E Co., Ltd., while driving on the front of the F, without properly examining the front room and who was on the road as shown in Appendix 1.

2) The instant accident was committed without viewing (hereinafter “instant accident”).

) The Deceased died on the same day on the same day due to its shock. 2) The Plaintiff is the mother of the Deceased, and the Defendant is the insurer who concluded the comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 4, Eul 1 through 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as an insurer of defendant vehicle.

C. The following circumstances revealed in full view of the purport of the entire arguments revealed prior to the limitation of liability: at the time of the instant accident, it appears that the street lamps were not installed around the time of the instant accident, and that the company lighting did not turn on; C returned the deceased before the dormitory and returned to the tunnel near the Cheongbuk new city, and returned to the dormitory, which was the site of the instant accident. In light of the above circumstances, it was difficult for the deceased to expect that the point of the instant accident would be attributable to the location of the instant accident. In light of the above, it is reasonable to consider the Defendant’s liability to compensate the damages calculated by the Defendant, but it is limited to 30% of the Defendant’s liability.

2. Liability for damages.