However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On May 30, 2016, at around 18:00, the Defendant received a single-use injection device, which contains approximately 0.33g of Mesophical drugs, from a person in an influence to his/her name, the Defendant received a single-use injection device, free of charge, from a person in an influence of his/her name, using approximately 0.33g of Mesophical drugs.

2. The Defendant 1 administered psychotropic drugs by inserting approximately 0.1g of phiphonephones received from the D Station of the above paragraph 1 at the “Ecom” near the D Station of the above paragraph 1, dilution with water, and injection with the Defendant’s arms in his arms.

3. On June 1, 2016, around 23:00, the Defendant administered a psychotropic medicine by inserting approximately 0.1g of philophones in a single-use injection machine, dilution with water, and dilution with the Defendant’s own arms at around 23:00.

4. On June 2, 2016, around 08:40, the Defendant: (a) on the front side of the “G” building located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul; (b) stored approximately 0.13 gram of philophones remaining after being administered as prescribed in the foregoing 2 and 3 in one-time injection unit; and (c) possessed a local mental medicine by having them stored in one-time injection unit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Investigation report (case of seized articles), investigation report (case of suspect A mobile phone confirmation investigation), investigation report (case of the reversal of victim's statement), investigation report (case of the reversal of victim's statement), investigation report (case of the location of the base station in the suspect mobile phone), investigation report (case of the suspect's cell phone trend attached to each month for narcotics), investigation report (case of attachment of narcotics), investigation

1. A response to each request for appraisal, a response to the appraisal with the requesting country, a reply to the appraisal with the making of a single response, and a response to the appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Narcotics, etc. under Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 and Article 2 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, respectively;