2. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. is 1,502,553.

A. The Plaintiff is an autonomous management organization composed of occupants to manage the “A Apartment” apartment in Busan-gun, Busan-gun (hereinafter “instant apartment”), and Defendant B is an executor who sold the instant apartment, and Defendant C is a contractor who newly built the instant apartment (hereinafter “new construction”), and Defendant C is the company that guaranteed Defendant C’s obligation to repair the defects of the instant apartment.

B. The apartment of this case was approved for use on November 27, 2015, but the use of the new apartment of this case was approved for use on the following grounds: Defendant C did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing at his own discretion, changed the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing, or constructed the apartment of this case or constructed the defective construction, thereby causing an obstacle to the function, aesthetic or safety in the apartment of this case; 2) The sectional owners of the apartment of this case and the Plaintiff requested the repair of defects on several occasions, but still there still remains the same defects as indicated in the “the “the calculation table of repair cost for each repair period” (hereinafter “the defect of this case”) in the common area and the section for exclusive use of the apartment of this case, and the detailed defect repair expenses for repairing the defect of this case are as follows.

(1) As a result of the Appraiser F’s initial appraisal, it excludes KRW 761,00,000 as a total of the defect repair costs related to the non-transferable household, and it reflects all the items determined in the following 2.1. In a case where the appraiser corrected errors or changed his opinion through the inquiry inquiry inquiry inquiry, it is calculated by reflecting the modified and supplemented results. (Unit : hereinafter the same shall apply)