However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of C Lastren motor vehicles.

On November 27, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.096% during blood transfusions, and was driving the said car without a driver’s license, which led to the operation of the said car in front of the central church in the Busan Jin-gu, Busan, to drive the road prior to the final church in the direction of the new red control hospital.

Since there is a house and the width of the road is relatively narrow, in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by accurately manipulating the other vehicle's progress and operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so on the part of his occupational negligence, which led to the left-hand side of the said rocketing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing car.

Although Defendant 1 caused damage to the above-mentioned AWn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn

2. The Defendant was driving a rocketing car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.096% in the blood without a driver’s license at the same time and at the same place as paragraph 1, and at the same time and place as that of paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. The circumstantial report of the driver employed at the main place;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Investigation report (Re-application of the dmark of alcohol concentration in suspect blood);

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Articles 148, 54(1), 148-2(2)3, 44(1), and 152 subparags. 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. Trade name;